Resources → Materials testing of rigid plastics

Our approach to rigid plastic mechanical testing at room temperature

Our materials testing services are designed to provide you with the data you need to make informed decisions about your materials selection. Our testing services are carried out in accordance with the relevant ISO and ASTM standards, and our team of experts are on hand to help you interpret the results.

Determining Physical Properties of Ceramics

We have outlined our general procedure for determining the physical properties of ceramics, including apparent solid density, bulk density and apparent porosity. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 18754 and ASTM C373 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting tests, and interpreting the results.

For both standards the boiling method was used for density and porosity measurements, our materials database incorporates these approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

For bulk density and porosity measurements the volume of each specimen was larger than 0.1 cm3 with a mass exceeding 50g in conformance to both ISO 18754 and ASTM C373. Specimens were typically cylindrical and were prepared using precise machining or molding techniques to ensure smooth surfaces free from defects such as notches, glazes or significant voids.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F), and relative humidity of 50% ± 10%, ensuring stable environmental conditions during measurements.

Apparatus

For mass measurements a precision balance was utilized, specimens were prepared in a drying oven and boiled in a water immersion tank fitted with setting pins to ensure full immersion.

Procedure

The dried mass of specimens was obtained by heating in a drying oven for a specified temperature and time followed by weighing.

  1. For ISO 18754 testing specimens were dried at 110°C ± 5°C (230°F ± 9°F) then allowed to cooling to room temperature in a dessicator.
  2. For ASTM C373 testing specimens were dried at 150°C (302°F) then allowed to cooling to room temperature in a dessicator.

The apparent mass of the immersed specimens was obtained by boiling in distilled water (ensuring full immersion) for a specified temperature and time, and then weighing while maintaining immersion. The soaked mass was also taken by removing the specimen from the liquid and removing any excess water.

  1. For ISO 18754 testing specimens were boiled for 3hrs and then allowed to cool to room temperature in water.
  2. For ASTM C373 testing specimens were boiled for 5hrs and then allowed to soak for an additional 24hrs.

Test Outcomes

As per the equations laid out in ISO 18754 and ASTM C373 the apparent solid density, bulk modulus and apparent porosity could be determined.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Tensile Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for tensile testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 527-1 and ASTM D638 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting tensile tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine similar properties but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, testing speeds, and the calculation of tensile properties. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining or molding techniques to ensure smooth surfaces free from defects such as notches, voids, or surface roughness that could affect the tensile properties.

  • ISO 527-1: Specifies the use of Type 1A or 1B multipurpose specimens, typically with a gauge length of 50 mm and thickness ranging from 1 mm to 4 mm, depending on the material and intended use.
  • ASTM D638: Recommends using different specimen types (Type I, II, III, IV, or V) based on the material thickness and mechanical properties, with Type I being the most commonly used for rigid plastics with a thickness up to 7 mm.
Illustration of tensile testing specimen for rigid plastics
# Dimensions ISO 527-1 Type 1A/1B ASTM D638 Type I
1 Gauge Length (L0) 50 mm 50 mm
2 Width (W) 10 mm 13 mm
3 Thickness (T) 1 - 4 mm Up to 7 mm
4 Overall Length (L) ≥ 150 mm 165 mm
5 Grip Length (Lg) ≥ 20 mm 57 mm
All dimensions are in mm.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a universal testing machine equipped with suitable grips and calibrated force measurement systems in accordance with ISO 7500-1 and ASTM E4. The grips were designed to prevent slippage without introducing additional stress to the specimen, ensuring accurate load application.

An extensometer was used to measure the strain, particularly in the elastic region, and was calibrated in accordance with ISO 9513 or ASTM E83 standards, depending on the test method used.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for tensile testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface quality requirements. Specimens were cut or molded according to standard specifications to ensure uniformity.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Mounting: The specimen was placed in the grips of the testing machine, ensuring proper alignment to prevent bending or off-axis loading. The grip pressure was carefully adjusted to avoid specimen damage.
  4. Applying Load: A tensile load was applied at a constant crosshead speed, typically 5 mm/min or as specified in the standard. The load was increased until the specimen reached yield or fractured.
  5. Data Collection: The force and corresponding strain data were recorded continuously to capture the stress-strain behavior of the material, including the modulus of elasticity, yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation at break.

Test Outcomes

The following mechanical properties are calculated from the tensile test data for rigid plastics:

  • Tensile Strength: The maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking, calculated from the peak load applied during the test divided by the original cross-sectional area of the specimen.
  • Modulus of Elasticity: The ratio of stress to strain in the elastic deformation region of the stress-strain curve, indicating the material's stiffness.
  • Elongation at Break: The increase in gauge length measured after fracture, expressed as a percentage of the original gauge length, indicating the ductility of the material.
  • Yield Strength: The stress at which a material begins to deform plastically. This value is defined differently in each standard.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Tensile testing of rigid plastics

Apparatus

Universal Testing Machine with tensile testing speeds ranging from 0.125 to 500mm/min, force measurements in compliance with ISO 7500-1 and fitted with a contact extensometer complying with ISO 9513.

Methodology

Unless otherwise stated, our plastics tensile testing was carried out in accordance with the methodology set out in ASTM D638 and ISO 527-1 / ISO 527-2. With at least 5 specimens being tested for each standard, in the case of anisotropic materials, 5 specimens were tested normal to, and five parallel with the normal axis of anisotropy. For rigid and semi-rigid plastics, a nominal testing speed of 5, 50, and 500 mm/min was used.

Specimens

For ASTM D638 tests, ‘Type I’ sized specimens used with the dimensions detailed in Table 1. For ISO 527-1 / ISO 527-2 tests, ‘1B’ sized specimens were used with the dimensions detailed in Table 1. Unless otherwise stated, all specimens were machined in accordance with ISO 2818.

Flexural Testing of Ceramics

We have outlined our general procedure for flexural testing of advanced ceramics. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 14704 and ASTM C1161 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting tensile tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine similar properties but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, testing speeds, and the calculation of flexural properties. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining or molding techniques to ensure smooth surfaces free from defects such as notches, voids, or surface roughness that could affect the tensile properties.

  • ISO 14704: Specifies the use of rectangular bars with a length-to-thickness ratio of at least 4:1 and smooth surfaces to minimize stress concentrations. The standard also allows for the use of round specimens with specified dimensions.
  • ASTM C1161: Recommends using rectangular specimens with defined dimensions, typically 3 mm x 4 mm x 45 mm for standard tests, with a length-to-thickness ratio of 10:1 to ensure uniform stress distribution.
Illustration of tensile testing specimen for ceramics
# Dimensions ISO 14704 ASTM C1161 Configuration B
L Support Span 40 40
L Length of Narrow Section 25
WO Width overall (minimum) 16
LO Length overall (minimum) 80
R Radius 6
G Gauge Length 20
D Distance between grips 64
T Thickness 3
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a universal testing machine equipped with suitable grips and calibrated force measurement systems in accordance with ISO 7500-1 and ASTM E4. The grips were designed to prevent slippage without introducing additional stress to the specimen, ensuring accurate load application.

An extensometer was used to measure the strain, particularly in the elastic region, and was calibrated in accordance with ISO 9513 or ASTM E83 standards, depending on the test method used.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for tensile testing of ceramics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface quality requirements. Specimens were cut or molded according to standard specifications to ensure uniformity.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Mounting: The specimen was placed in the grips of the testing machine, ensuring proper alignment to prevent bending or off-axis loading. The grip pressure was carefully adjusted to avoid specimen damage.
  4. Applying Load: A tensile load was applied at a constant crosshead speed, typically 0.5 mm/min or as specified in the standard. The load was increased until the specimen reached yield or fractured.
  5. Data Collection: The force and corresponding strain data were recorded continuously to capture the stress-strain behavior of the material, including the modulus of elasticity, yield strength, tensile strength, and elongation at break.

Test Outcomes

The following mechanical properties are calculated from the tensile test data for ceramics:

  • Tensile Strength: The maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking, calculated from the peak load applied during the test divided by the original cross-sectional area of the specimen.
  • Modulus of Elasticity: The ratio of stress to strain in the elastic deformation region of the stress-strain curve, indicating the material's stiffness.
  • Elongation at Break: The increase in gauge length measured after fracture, expressed as a percentage of the original gauge length, indicating the ductility of the material.
  • Fracture Toughness: The ability of a material containing a crack to resist fracture, an important property for ceramics due to their brittle nature.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Compressive Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for compressive testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 604 and ASTM D695 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting compressive tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine similar properties but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, testing speeds, and the calculation of compressive properties. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining or molding techniques to ensure uniform shape and smooth surfaces that are free from defects such as notches, voids, or surface roughness that could affect the compressive properties.

  • ISO 604: Specifies the use of cylindrical or prismatic specimens with a minimum diameter or width of 10 mm and a length-to-diameter ratio (L/D) of 2:1 to ensure uniform stress distribution during testing.
  • ASTM D695: Recommends using a right-cylindrical specimen with a diameter of 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) and a length of 25.4 mm (1 in.), or a rectangular specimen with dimensions of 12.7 mm × 12.7 mm × 25.4 mm. The ends of the specimens must be flat and parallel to within 0.025 mm (0.001 in.) to ensure accurate compression testing.
# Dimensions ISO 604 ASTM D695
1 Diameter (D) or Width (W) ≥ 10 mm 12.7 mm (0.5 in.)
2 Length (L) 2 × Diameter (2D) 25.4 mm (1 in.)
3 Length-to-Diameter Ratio (L/D) 2:1 2:1
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a universal testing machine fitted with compression platens. The testing machine was calibrated in accordance with ISO 7500-1 and ASTM E4 for accurate force measurement. The compression platens were polished and aligned to minimize friction and ensure even distribution of force across the specimen's surface.

An extensometer or compression strain gauge was used to measure the strain in the specimen, particularly in the elastic region, and was calibrated according to ISO 9513 or ASTM E83 standards, depending on the test method used.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for compressive testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface quality requirements. The ends of the specimens were machined to be flat and parallel to ensure even distribution of compressive force.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Placement: The specimen was placed between the compression platens of the testing machine, ensuring proper alignment to avoid bending or uneven force application. The platens were adjusted to make full contact with the specimen surfaces.
  4. Applying Load: A compressive load was applied at a constant crosshead speed, typically 1.3 mm/min (0.05 in./min) or as specified in the standard. The load was increased until the specimen yielded or fractured.
  5. Data Collection: The force and corresponding strain data were recorded continuously to capture the stress-strain behavior of the material, including the modulus of elasticity, compressive yield strength, and compressive strength at break.

Test Outcomes

The following mechanical properties are calculated from the compressive test data for rigid plastics:

  • Compressive Strength: The maximum stress a material can withstand under compression before yielding or fracturing, calculated as the peak load applied during the test divided by the original cross-sectional area of the specimen.
  • Modulus of Elasticity in Compression: The ratio of stress to strain in the elastic deformation region of the stress-strain curve, indicating the material's stiffness in compression.
  • Compressive Yield Strength: The stress at which a material begins to deform plastically under compressive load. This value is defined differently in each standard.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Compression testing of rigid plastics

Apparatus

Universal Testing Machine fitted with compression platens and calibrated force measurements in compliance with ISO 7500-1. For modulus calculations, a verified contact extensometer complying with ISO 9513.

Methodology

Unless otherwise stated, our plastics tensile testing was carried out in accordance with the methodology set out in ASTM D638 and ISO 527-1 / ISO 527-2. With at least 5 specimens being tested for each standard, in the case of anisotropic materials, 5 specimens were tested normal to, and five parallel with the normal axis of anisotropy. For rigid and semi-rigid plastics, a nominal testing speed of 5, 50, and 500 mm/min was used.

Specimens

For ASTM D638 tests, ‘Type I’ sized specimens used with the dimensions detailed in Table 1. For ISO 527-1 / ISO 527-2 tests, ‘1B’ sized specimens were used with the dimensions detailed in Table 1. Unless otherwise stated, all specimens were machined in accordance with ISO 2818.

Rockwell Hardness Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for Rockwell hardness testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 2039-2 and ASTM D785 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting hardness tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine the hardness of rigid plastics, but they differ in aspects such as indenter types, loads applied, and testing procedures. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining techniques to ensure flat, smooth surfaces that are free from defects such as notches, scratches, or indentations that could affect the hardness measurements.

  • ISO 2039-2: Specifies the use of flat specimens with a minimum thickness of 6 mm to ensure that the material's hardness is accurately measured without influence from the substrate. The specimen surface must be flat and free from damage to ensure proper contact with the indenter.
  • ASTM D785: Recommends using flat specimens with a thickness of at least 3.2 mm (0.125 in.). The surface should be smooth and free from imperfections, ensuring consistent hardness measurements across multiple test points.
# Specimen Requirements ISO 2039-2 ASTM D785
1 Minimum Thickness 6 mm 3.2 mm (0.125 in.)
2 Surface Condition Flat and free from damage Flat and smooth
3 Number of Indentations 3 or more, depending on specimen size 3 or more, evenly spaced
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a Rockwell hardness tester equipped with a suitable indenter and load application system. The testing apparatus was calibrated in accordance with ISO 2039-2 and ASTM D785 standards to ensure accurate hardness measurements.

The indenter used was a steel ball (1/8 inch or 3.18 mm in diameter), and the load applied was consistent with the specific Rockwell scale (Rockwell M, L, R) designated for rigid plastics. The test apparatus was equipped with a digital readout to record the hardness value accurately.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for Rockwell hardness testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified thickness and surface condition requirements. Specimens were cut or machined to provide a flat testing surface free of any surface imperfections.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Placement: The specimen was placed on the anvil of the Rockwell hardness tester. The surface to be tested was positioned directly under the indenter to ensure proper alignment and contact.
  4. Applying Load: A preliminary minor load was applied to seat the indenter, followed by the major load required for the specific Rockwell scale being used. The indenter was held in place for a specified dwell time to allow for any viscoelastic recovery.
  5. Data Collection: The Rockwell hardness number (HR) was automatically calculated and displayed on the machine's digital readout. Multiple readings were taken at different points on the specimen to ensure consistency and repeatability of results.

Test Outcomes

The following properties are determined from the Rockwell hardness test data for rigid plastics:

  • Rockwell Hardness Number (HR): The depth of penetration of the indenter under a specified load, expressed in terms of the Rockwell hardness scale (M, L, or R). Higher numbers indicate harder materials.
  • Consistency Across Multiple Indentations: The uniformity of hardness measurements across different points on the specimen surface provides insight into the material's homogeneity and surface condition.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Apparatus

Rockwell hardness tester fitted with a flat anvil of at least 50mm. The indentor sizes used were 1/8in (3.18mm) / 1/4in (6.35mm) / ½ in (12.7mm) balls

Methodology

The surface conditions were as machined, ensuring measurement faces were free of bulges, markings, or defects. Rockwell hardness scales R / L / M / E were made at the following conditions:

Rockwell Hardness Scale Minor Load (N) Major Load (N) Indentor Diameter (mm)
R 10 60 12.7
L 10 60 6.35
M 10 100 6.35
E 10 100 3.175

Tests were carried out in accordance with ISO 2309-2 and ASTM D785. In each case, at least five hardness tests were made, and for anisotropic materials, five tests were made along each principal axis of anisotropy.

Specimens

Test specimens have a thickness exceeding 6mm, with flat parallel surfaces, and were typically circular cross-section with diameters exceeding 25mm.

Thermal Conductivity Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for thermal conductivity testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 22007-2 and ASTM D5930 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting thermal conductivity tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine the thermal conductivity of rigid plastics but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, test methods, and calculation of thermal properties. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining techniques to ensure they meet the required dimensions and surface conditions. Specimens were made flat, smooth, and free from defects such as voids or inclusions that could affect the thermal conductivity measurements.

  • ISO 22007-2: Specifies using disc or square specimens with a minimum thickness of 1 mm and a diameter or side length sufficient to accommodate the sensor size. The surface should be smooth to ensure proper contact with the thermal sensor.
  • ASTM D5930: Recommends using flat specimens with a thickness of at least 1 mm and a sufficient size to cover the area of the sensor. The surface must be flat and free from any surface irregularities to ensure accurate thermal contact with the sensor.
# Specimen Requirements ISO 22007-2 ASTM D5930
1 Minimum Thickness 1 mm 1 mm
2 Specimen Size Diameter or side length sufficient for sensor size Sufficient size to cover sensor area
3 Surface Condition Smooth, flat, and free from defects Flat and free from irregularities
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a thermal conductivity analyzer equipped with a heat flow meter or a guarded hot plate, depending on the specific standard being followed. The testing apparatus was calibrated in accordance with ISO 22007-2 and ASTM D5930 standards to ensure accurate measurements of thermal conductivity.

The apparatus was equipped with sensors capable of measuring heat flow and temperature difference across the specimen, ensuring that the thermal conductivity can be calculated precisely.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for thermal conductivity testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface condition requirements. Specimens were cut or machined to provide a flat testing surface free of any surface imperfections.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Placement: The specimen was placed in the thermal conductivity analyzer, ensuring proper contact between the specimen surface and the sensors to avoid any air gaps that could affect the measurements.
  4. Applying Heat Flow: A controlled heat flow was applied through the specimen while the sensors measured the temperature difference across it. The steady-state method or the transient method was used, depending on the standard and equipment setup.
  5. Data Collection: The thermal conductivity (k) was calculated based on the heat flow, temperature difference, specimen thickness, and sensor area. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure consistency and repeatability of results.

Test Outcomes

The following thermal properties are determined from the thermal conductivity test data for rigid plastics:

  • Thermal Conductivity (k): The rate at which heat is conducted through a material, calculated based on the steady-state or transient heat flow method. It is expressed in watts per meter-kelvin (W/m·K).
  • Thermal Diffusivity: The measure of how quickly heat spreads through a material, which can also be derived from the thermal conductivity data if the material's density and specific heat are known.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Electrical Conductivity Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for electrical conductivity testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 3915 and ASTM D257 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting electrical conductivity tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine the electrical conductivity of rigid plastics but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, test methods, and calculation of electrical properties. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining techniques to ensure they meet the required dimensions and surface conditions. Specimens were made flat, smooth, and free from defects such as voids or surface irregularities that could affect the electrical conductivity measurements.

  • ISO 3915: Specifies using flat specimens with a minimum thickness of 1 mm and a sufficient size to ensure proper contact with electrodes. The surface should be smooth to ensure uniform electrical contact.
  • ASTM D257: Recommends using flat, rectangular specimens with a minimum thickness of 1 mm and dimensions large enough to accommodate the electrodes. The surface must be free of contaminants and polished to ensure good electrical contact.
Illustration of electrical conductivity testing specimen for rigid plastics
# Specimen Requirements ISO 3915 ASTM D257
1 Minimum Thickness 1 mm 1 mm
2 Specimen Size Sufficient to ensure proper electrode contact Large enough to accommodate electrodes
3 Surface Condition Smooth and free from defects Polished and free of contaminants
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using a resistivity meter or electrometer capable of measuring low conductivity materials, equipped with electrodes suitable for rigid plastics. The testing apparatus was calibrated in accordance with ISO 3915 and ASTM D257 standards to ensure accurate measurements of electrical conductivity.

The apparatus was equipped with a high-impedance voltage source and sensitive current measuring device to detect small currents passing through the specimen, ensuring precise determination of electrical conductivity.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for electrical conductivity testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface condition requirements. Specimens were cut or machined to provide a flat testing surface free of any surface imperfections or contaminants.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to reach equilibrium with the testing environment, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Specimen Placement: The specimen was placed between the electrodes of the resistivity meter, ensuring proper alignment and contact to avoid any gaps that could affect the measurements.
  4. Applying Voltage: A specified voltage was applied across the specimen while the current passing through it was measured. The voltage and current were monitored to ensure they remained within the limits specified by the standards.
  5. Data Collection: The electrical conductivity (σ) was calculated based on the measured current, applied voltage, and specimen dimensions. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure consistency and repeatability of results.

Test Outcomes

The following electrical properties are determined from the electrical conductivity test data for rigid plastics:

  • Electrical Conductivity (σ): The ability of a material to conduct electric current, calculated based on the measured current, applied voltage, and specimen dimensions. It is expressed in siemens per meter (S/m).
  • Volume Resistivity (ρ): The measure of a material's resistance to electric current flow through its volume, inversely related to electrical conductivity. It is expressed in ohm-meters (Ω·m).

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.

Chemical Durability Testing of Rigid Plastics

We have outlined our general procedure for chemical durability testing of rigid plastics at room temperature. This structured approach ensures reliable and consistent data for material characterization and quality control purposes in accordance with ISO 175 and ASTM D543 standards.

While we have provided a summary of our process here, it is essential to refer to the full standards for detailed guidance on preparing test specimens, conducting chemical durability tests, and interpreting the results.

Both standards aim to determine the chemical resistance of rigid plastics but differ in aspects such as specimen dimensions, test methods, exposure conditions, and evaluation of chemical effects. Our materials database incorporates both approaches to provide comprehensive data representation.

Specimen Preparation

All test specimens were prepared using precise machining techniques to ensure they meet the required dimensions and surface conditions. Specimens were made flat, smooth, and free from defects such as notches or surface irregularities that could affect the chemical durability measurements.

  • ISO 175: Specifies using flat specimens with a minimum thickness of 1 mm and dimensions large enough to allow immersion in the test solution. The surface should be smooth and free from visible flaws to ensure uniform chemical exposure.
  • ASTM D543: Recommends using flat or curved specimens with a thickness of at least 1 mm. The specimen size should be appropriate for the chemical exposure method, with surfaces that are free from defects or surface contamination.
Illustration of chemical durability testing specimen for rigid plastics
# Specimen Requirements ISO 175 ASTM D543
1 Minimum Thickness 1 mm 1 mm
2 Specimen Size Sufficient for immersion Appropriate for exposure method
3 Surface Condition Smooth and free from visible flaws Free from defects or contamination
All dimensions are in mm unless otherwise specified.

Specimen testing and conditioning were conducted at room temperature, defined as 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F).

Apparatus

All testing was conducted using chemical resistance baths, containers, or exposure chambers equipped to maintain consistent environmental conditions and chemical concentration levels. The testing apparatus was calibrated in accordance with ISO 175 and ASTM D543 standards to ensure accurate exposure and testing conditions.

The apparatus included temperature-controlled baths or containers, as well as lids or covers to minimize evaporation or contamination of the chemical solutions. The equipment was capable of holding the specimens in a manner that prevents contact with the container walls to ensure uniform chemical exposure.

Procedure

The following test procedure was used for chemical durability testing of rigid plastics according to each standard:

  1. Specimen Preparation: Each specimen was prepared to meet the specified dimensions and surface condition requirements. Specimens were cleaned and dried to remove any contaminants that could affect chemical interaction.
  2. Conditioning: The specimens were conditioned at 23°C ± 5°C (73.4°F ± 9°F) and 50% relative humidity for at least 16 hours to ensure uniform test conditions, as recommended by both standards.
  3. Exposure to Chemicals: Specimens were immersed in or exposed to the chemical test solution in a controlled environment. The exposure time, temperature, and chemical concentration were set according to the specific requirements of the test being conducted.
  4. Observation and Measurement: At specified intervals, specimens were removed from the chemical solution, rinsed, dried, and weighed or measured for changes in mass, dimensions, or appearance. Some tests required mechanical testing of the specimens post-exposure to determine changes in properties.
  5. Data Collection: Data on changes in mass, dimensions, surface condition, and mechanical properties (if applicable) were collected and recorded. Multiple measurements were taken to ensure consistency and repeatability of results.

Test Outcomes

The following properties are determined from the chemical durability test data for rigid plastics:

  • Mass Change: The percentage change in specimen mass after chemical exposure, indicating material degradation or absorption. It is calculated by comparing the specimen's mass before and after exposure.
  • Dimensional Stability: The change in specimen dimensions (length, width, thickness) after chemical exposure, used to assess the material's stability and resistance to swelling or shrinkage.
  • Surface Condition: The visual or microscopic evaluation of the specimen surface for signs of chemical attack, such as cracking, crazing, discoloration, or pitting.
  • Retention of Mechanical Properties: The assessment of changes in mechanical properties (e.g., tensile strength, elongation) after chemical exposure, providing insights into the material's structural integrity.

For the listed material properties in the Manta Materials data tables, the values are averaged from multiple test specimens per standard, with adjustments made for testing tolerances and uncertainties.